Nav Ad Widget - Mobile

Collapse

Nav Ad Widget - Desktop

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Watches I saw Ppl wear today! Gossip Thread!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Oceanklassik
    replied
    Originally posted by desfrie View Post
    People here in Singapore are in general more interested in watches and wearing them. This is a good sign. If you look at the top 10 swiss watch world import market, Singapore is in the Top 10 and HK is No. 1! That is why when you go to HK, you see watch shops all over. Panerai for example has 2 boutiques there with 1 just opened at Canton Road. Even the customs officer at the airport are wearing Rolex Submariners. When you go to the Central area during lunch time, it is watches galore! On the contrary in Australia for example, watches like Tissot, Citizen, Longines and Tags are considered as value for money. A rolex watch is considered very luxurious. Really different culture.

    I don't think it is just about getting affluent. Singapore has been affluent for a number of years. It is a greater sense of appreciation for the finer things in life in the form of horology. I look forward to a more vibrant luxury watch culture in Singapore!
    This is a very uplifting message .

    Leave a comment:


  • desfrie
    replied
    Finer Things in Life

    People here in Singapore are in general more interested in watches and wearing them. This is a good sign. If you look at the top 10 swiss watch world import market, Singapore is in the Top 10 and HK is No. 1! That is why when you go to HK, you see watch shops all over. Panerai for example has 2 boutiques there with 1 just opened at Canton Road. Even the customs officer at the airport are wearing Rolex Submariners. When you go to the Central area during lunch time, it is watches galore! On the contrary in Australia for example, watches like Tissot, Citizen, Longines and Tags are considered as value for money. A rolex watch is considered very luxurious. Really different culture.

    I don't think it is just about getting affluent. Singapore has been affluent for a number of years. It is a greater sense of appreciation for the finer things in life in the form of horology. I look forward to a more vibrant luxury watch culture in Singapore!

    Leave a comment:


  • Oceanklassik
    replied
    Originally posted by tsetse View Post
    wah so many discussions on rich, I say Im not rich cos my income not very high, and Im using my savings to buy watches, for ppl who are relli rich is simply their income so high that they are using their monthly income to buy watches or other luxury stuff without the need to touch their savings???
    Then I will say your term of 'rich' is inappropriate/incorrect. It doesn't matter if it is your savings or monthly pay that you are using to buy watches. The point is, it is your money that you are using to buy watches, right? And mind you, it is "to buy WATCHES", not to buy rice, medicine, etc (basic necessities). Then again, it also depends who/how you are comparing with. If you are comparing your wealth with a tycoon/millionaire/billionaire, then you are not wrong.. . But generally, you are still considered rich..

    Just like how I often see people titling their threads as "humble collection", "humble watches", etc-etc. And when you open those threads and see the watch collection they have, that they termed "humble", you will drop from your chair !

    Leave a comment:


  • tsetse
    replied
    wah so many discussions on rich, I say Im not rich cos my income not very high, and Im using my savings to buy watches, for ppl who are relli rich is simply their income so high that they are using their monthly income to buy watches or other luxury stuff without the need to touch their savings???

    Leave a comment:


  • pegasi
    replied
    Well, I guess ppl who can splash on luxurious car + luxurious watchesssss (the "s" are not typo error) can be considered rich.

    I am not saying ppl who dun own the above are definitely not rich but ppl who can afford those are definitely rich (of course there are different levels of rich but let's not go into that). Whether or not they have a lot of cash in the bank, these ppl are surely in the high-income group...

    Leave a comment:


  • pastilence666
    replied
    Originally posted by sanbecky View Post
    Ya agree, the definition of rich varies.. Anw do u all consider a person to be rich if he/she owns alot of luxury items but has zero bank account balance?
    As long you can fulfill your want means consider rich? And of course your need

    Very subjective: )

    Leave a comment:


  • Oceanklassik
    replied
    Originally posted by sanbecky View Post
    Ya agree, the definition of rich varies.. Anw do u all consider a person to be rich if he/she owns alot of luxury items but has zero bank account balance?
    I will say - 'materially rich'; 'financially poor'..

    Leave a comment:


  • sanbecky
    replied
    Ya agree, the definition of rich varies.. Anw do u all consider a person to be rich if he/she owns alot of luxury items but has zero bank account balance?

    Leave a comment:


  • Oceanklassik
    replied
    'Rich' is very subjective. The definition varies from person to person. It can be a sensitive topic too. Are you 'rich' if you:

    - own and live in a private residential apartment/house?
    - own and drive a branded (Volvo/Audi/BMW) vehicle?
    - have one or more domestic helpers (maids) in the family?
    - be able to at least have two meals a day in a classy restaurant?
    - own and wear at least two luxury-branded watch?

    So, how to define?

    Leave a comment:


  • shuseido
    replied
    Originally posted by wolfeyes1974 View Post
    how do one define rich leh bro? see you change and buy watches so often still not consider rich ah?
    Agreed! tsetse bro, pls explain...

    Leave a comment:


  • wolfeyes1974
    replied
    Originally posted by tsetse View Post
    hehehe yeah, but watches are still considered a luxury item to me, cos I have not reach the standard of being rich yet hehehehe
    how do one define rich leh bro? see you change and buy watches so often still not consider rich ah?

    Leave a comment:


  • tsetse
    replied
    Originally posted by Rolesor View Post
    Not rich. Just that house too expensive car too expensive everything too expensive. Get bonus buy what? Buy watch lor
    hehehe yeah, but watches are still considered a luxury item to me, cos I have not reach the standard of being rich yet hehehehe

    Leave a comment:


  • Rolesor
    replied
    Not rich. Just that house too expensive car too expensive everything too expensive. Get bonus buy what? Buy watch lor

    Originally posted by tsetse View Post
    Wah nowadays everyone very rich, all wear nice watches! Its good! Cos means majority of the people are affluent and enjoying their lives. Happy for everyone to be able to indulge in themselves!

    Wah seh, wear PAM for ICT.....if I go ICT, I wear my old trust G Shock. Its 8 years old btw, but during moving of house, I lost my old G Shock, need to dig and dig to find my old G Shock....

    Leave a comment:


  • tsetse
    replied
    Wah nowadays everyone very rich, all wear nice watches! Its good! Cos means majority of the people are affluent and enjoying their lives. Happy for everyone to be able to indulge in themselves!

    Wah seh, wear PAM for ICT.....if I go ICT, I wear my old trust G Shock. Its 8 years old btw, but during moving of house, I lost my old G Shock, need to dig and dig to find my old G Shock....

    Leave a comment:


  • pastilence666
    replied
    Originally posted by tradert View Post
    Hi,
    These days i see people wearing Rolex and Omega on MRT / Bus, especially working professionals and older men.
    Yha, I was eating my lunch and the person beside me, wearing rolex.... white dial,guess explorer series.....feel like molest it....

    Seldom see carrier santos, another sexy watch...

    Leave a comment:

Footer Ad Widget - Desktop

Collapse

Footer Ad Widget - Mobile

Collapse
Working...
X