Nav Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Nav Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rolex Service Centre Experience
Collapse
X
-
Sounds like a great idea for the consumers. But this will not go down well with the staff/technicians of the ROLEX Service Centre (RSC). Even if they are forced to do that (if at all), the company will put in place certain disclaimers to protect their staff. As it is now, the time taken to repair/service, even simple jobs, is already taking a long time. If this initiative ever takes place, can you imagine how long (price may even increase further) a simple watch servicing at RSC would take?
-
maybe it is time for RSC to implement taking of photos of the watch before and after.
Originally posted by pp_hz View PostI am not sure where to air my unhappiness. This is my first time owning a Rolex and it took Hour Glass quite sometime to get me a piece of the 116610LN. I have owned several watches from other makers like Panerai, JLC & AP, all of them had provided me with a good watch servicing experience, especially AP.
3 August (Thursday) - Bought my Sub Date on from THG. Removed protective stickers, planning to wear the watch on Monday. Sadly, realised that the bezel alignment is off-centre.
7 August (Monday) - Wore the watch for the first time and sent it into RSC at Tong Building. Wrist time 2 hours.
10 August (Thursday) - Collected the watch and it glistened with FRESH SCRATCHES over the case back and the bracelet.
It was infuriating to have them insinuate that I had put these scratches on by myself prior to sending them in and they offered to remove the scratches on the caseback and clasp. They had the caseback scratches partially removed but in the process they put in more scratches on it. I am aware that scratches are a part and parcel of watch ownership and I really do not mind having them if these scratches are put on by MYSELF. And having the watch mutilated when it's barely a week old is just unacceptable into my new world of Rolex ownership.
Battle scars upon eventual collection:
1. Caseback: circular scratches
2. Clasp: Scuff mark on the edges
3. Case: scratches on the case
There were at least 3 staff who had attended to this incident and not only do they seem unapologetic for their deplorable watch servicing ability, they do not seem motivated to provide any form of recourse too. What I received from their end was "What do you plan to do about the scratches Sir?"
I know that asking for a brand new watch case, caseback and bracelet (Effectively a new watch) is going to be quite tough, hence I hope that they will at least attempt to make up by providing a new case back as well as a new bracelet, installed under the strictest supervision.
I hope this will serve as a BIG RED warning for those who intend to send in their brand new Rolex into RSC to rectify little issues that we can potentially live with. The bezel alignment was slightly off but I could have lived with it. And now, it's going to be an ensuing days of arguments with RSC to have this rectified.
Leave a comment:
-
Oh dear
So, what is the RSC going to do about it? Or what do you intend to do? Can you not withhold payment? Or was it free service?
This is clearly unacceptable
Leave a comment:
-
RSC Damaged my 4 days old Sub Date
I am not sure where to air my unhappiness. This is my first time owning a Rolex and it took Hour Glass quite sometime to get me a piece of the 116610LN. I have owned several watches from other makers like Panerai, JLC & AP, all of them had provided me with a good watch servicing experience, especially AP.
3 August (Thursday) - Bought my Sub Date on from THG. Removed protective stickers, planning to wear the watch on Monday. Sadly, realised that the bezel alignment is off-centre.
7 August (Monday) - Wore the watch for the first time and sent it into RSC at Tong Building. Wrist time 2 hours.
10 August (Thursday) - Collected the watch and it glistened with FRESH SCRATCHES over the case back and the bracelet.
It was infuriating to have them insinuate that I had put these scratches on by myself prior to sending them in and they offered to remove the scratches on the caseback and clasp. They had the caseback scratches partially removed but in the process they put in more scratches on it. I am aware that scratches are a part and parcel of watch ownership and I really do not mind having them if these scratches are put on by MYSELF. And having the watch mutilated when it's barely a week old is just unacceptable into my new world of Rolex ownership.
Battle scars upon eventual collection:
1. Caseback: circular scratches
2. Clasp: Scuff mark on the edges
3. Case: scratches on the case
There were at least 3 staff who had attended to this incident and not only do they seem unapologetic for their deplorable watch servicing ability, they do not seem motivated to provide any form of recourse too. What I received from their end was "What do you plan to do about the scratches Sir?"
I know that asking for a brand new watch case, caseback and bracelet (Effectively a new watch) is going to be quite tough, hence I hope that they will at least attempt to make up by providing a new case back as well as a new bracelet, installed under the strictest supervision.
I hope this will serve as a BIG RED warning for those who intend to send in their brand new Rolex into RSC to rectify little issues that we can potentially live with. The bezel alignment was slightly off but I could have lived with it. And now, it's going to be an ensuing days of arguments with RSC to have this rectified.
Leave a comment:
-
Sent a black bay for regulation, not very good but not very bad experience. meh.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by taxico View PostRSC hates having to touch vintage rolex watches, so if you're "authenticating" a modern watch (especially models sold since the millennium), the quote above is probably correct.
RSCs have been known to make errors with crystals and other parts on older watches before (both ways).
a re-dial on a vintage model (using a genuine plate) is still a rolex part. but they would have to remove the dial (remove movement, remove hands, take the dial out) to inspect the rear of it carefully to ascertain the dial is genuine. i doubt they do that.
what about aftermarket diamonds set into an original plain gold bezel? older gold bezels are unmarked at the rear. how will a rolex tech know without removing more stuff?
i personally know someone who sent in a 16610 sub with an aftermarket crystal without cyclops into RSC before. no issue raised by the staff.
Of course sending a watch for a complete overhaul @ RSC can be assured of 100% genuine Rolex parts but I think that is too costly for an authentication purpose.
Cheers.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sty13 View Postdepends on you bring watch to service center for what purpose
for authentication, parts replacement (eg buy new bracelet, or change crystal) and polishing, no need to bring warranty card as these are not covered by warranty, need to pay
for regulating movement or for repair of movement (eg if movement inaccurate or watch cant be wind), bring warranty card
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by chiamcc View PostThink the parts in their check list will be casing, movement, dial, hands, bezel, crystal and band/bracelet; they will at least make sure these parts are genuine Rolex. If any of these happen to be aftermarket, they will inform you verbally when you collect the watch.
RSCs have been known to make errors with crystals and other parts on older watches before (both ways).
a re-dial on a vintage model (using a genuine plate) is still a rolex part. but they would have to remove the dial (remove movement, remove hands, take the dial out) to inspect the rear of it carefully to ascertain the dial is genuine. i doubt they do that.
what about aftermarket diamonds set into an original plain gold bezel? older gold bezels are unmarked at the rear. how will a rolex tech know without removing more stuff?
i personally know someone who sent in a 16610 sub with an aftermarket crystal without cyclops into RSC before. no issue raised by the staff.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ErnestSim View PostHi, i m a newbie here.
Just got hold of an preown gmt 2 recently...nver get it authentic by rsc..but i brought it there to do some repair. Am correct to say if they accept the watch & did the repair, am i quite safe to say that pc is authenic?
Leave a comment:
-
Hi, i m a newbie here.
Just got hold of an preown gmt 2 recently...nver get it authentic by rsc..but i brought it there to do some repair. Am correct to say if they accept the watch & did the repair, am i quite safe to say that pc is authenic?
Leave a comment:
-
depends on you bring watch to service center for what purpose
for authentication, parts replacement (eg buy new bracelet, or change crystal) and polishing, no need to bring warranty card as these are not covered by warranty, need to pay
for regulating movement or for repair of movement (eg if movement inaccurate or watch cant be wind), bring warranty card
Originally posted by nelsonhtb View PostSorry for piggyback here. New member and new owner.
May I know if bring in watch to service centre need to bring warranty card for verification?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by nelsonhtb View PostSorry for piggyback here. New member and new owner.
May I know if bring in watch to service centre need to bring warranty card for verification?
Leave a comment:
-
When I sent mine in, it took more than a day. The lady called me to inform me that it was a bit longer than usual because it was a vintage piece. She said I need not worry as the watch was ok, it was old so they had to check "some thing" with Geneva.
When I collected the watch, I asked about how they verified the watch, she said they opened it up, checked that all the parts were original, sent it to Geneva to confirm (I asked sent what to Geneva, she said serial numbers etc, some pictures).
There you go. Happy New Year to all.
Leave a comment:
Footer Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Footer Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Leave a comment: