Sub-ND vs Sub-GD (Got-Date)

[exxondus]

hmm from the looks of it, seems like the reason as to why there are less preowned sub-ND is because less people wanna buy it

[116520]

I like it with date!!!

[exxondus]

thanks for the info.

but dunno why leh, really like the clean look without the cyclops. I need to really try both on before i make a conclusion.

btw, SD has no cyclops but heard its much thicker and hence doesnt sit that well on skinny wrists like me. I only tried SD once n turned out i pefere the GMTIIc thats why never get SD.

anyway, saw Sub-ND at Peng Hwee....selling for $5500!!! P series without the COSC...damn nice but price is crazy sia....

[Familyfirst]

I ever considered sub no date for the clean look and without cyclops, but quickly changed my mind. As sub date has better values and the date function is useful, especially true when I need to put a date next to my signature.

So, I prefer sub date.

[onlywanghong]

Some people prefer a very clean look with no disruption to the Dial. Personally a watch to me, without a date is no good to me. I do enjoy the cyclops that helps me greating without straining me eyes.

[triton]

to me, a watch besides telling time, the next most use function is date. so watch must have date. number 1 criteria for me.

[exxondus]

erhm, just curious to see how many people prefer which one.

I find that lots of sub-date for sale but only found 1 sub-ND for sale.

is it cos less people buy it or is it cs most people prefer to keep the sub-nd?


Thanks!