Originally posted by pkc
Nav Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Nav Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Submariner LV VS LB VS LN
Collapse
X
-
Actually for a ss black sub oso not that cheap cos it cost 10k plus? I think because is much easier to match n looks more sporty plus the value will be stays better if want to resell. Important is buy what u like doesnt mean that newbie will get ss sub i guess
-
You are right. I personally exprienced this.Originally posted by Joshuasjw View PostActually for a ss black sub oso not that cheap cos it cost 10k plus? I think because is much easier to match n looks more sporty plus the value will be stays better if want to resell. Important is buy what u like doesnt mean that newbie will get ss sub i guess
Actually I am also aiming for Sub SS in the begining, but I end up with Explorer II / 16570 bk.
No regrat till now.
///// ///// ////// ////// /////
Comment
-
[QUOTE=Derick;826658]You are right. I personally exprienced this.
Actually I am also aiming for Sub SS in the begining, but I end up with Explorer II / 16570 bk.
No regrat till now.
Yap always get the one u like it n have no regrets in the end. Just like i got my first rollie is a blue sub tt. Cos compare the LV,LN n LB but my final choice is 116613lb cos more unique n striking conpare to other two. Just want something different
Comment
-
"cheap" ?by whose standard?yours arOriginally posted by pkcSS black sub date
confirm everywhere can see
maybe because its cheap
or maybe these are first time rolex buyers who want to 'play safe' by buying a common model
i have a feeling people who wear SS black sub date are newbies to rolex
u talk like u hv a pea brain
omg!
Comment
Footer Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Footer Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse

Comment