Nav Ad Widget - Mobile

Collapse

Nav Ad Widget - Desktop

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cannot decide new(42mm) or old(40mm) Explorer II

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Derick
    replied
    If : 16570 : 40mm = $5,000.00 =) 1mm = $125.00

    If :216570 : 42mm = $10,000.00 =) 1mm = $ 238.00

    Difference is $113/mm

    Can any bros or sises work the weight against the price ? Cos I do not have the weight spect.

    Leave a comment:


  • Derick
    replied
    If :
    40mm = $5k
    42mm = $10k

    I will buy 2 x 40mm = 80mm @ $10k ( Black & White one each)

    Black for day and White for night. Siok & Cool.

    Leave a comment:


  • Derick
    replied
    If :
    40mm = $5k
    42mm = $10k

    I will buy 2 x 40mm = 80mm (Black & White one each)
    Black for day, white for night..... Siok !

    Leave a comment:


  • stevenlim1995
    replied
    I prefer the older model model from m series onwards as its with the new movement and has chapter ring. A good option for collection if you come across a good condition full set unit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Oceanklassik
    replied
    I thought the 216570 comes with 3187 movement?

    Leave a comment:


  • sthark
    replied
    get the new 42mm, got a fresher look!

    Leave a comment:


  • LPYeo
    replied
    No sure if this is the answer to your question:
    Explorer II (16570) 40mm: ceased production on mid 2011. Hence, you can only find G and earlier series (V, M, Z, D, F, Y etc.)
    Explorer II (216570) 40mm: Took over from mid 2011, Basel Fair. So far only G and Alpha numeric (Random number) series

    Leave a comment:


  • mavkertyer
    replied
    A quick question of the difference of series in the Explorer II?

    Leave a comment:


  • deli
    replied
    42mm is the best choice.

    Leave a comment:


  • ac_wong75
    replied
    Sort of Agree with Bro Puck , btw the black and white exp 2 I would say white is prefereabel as this is only other model sports besides the daytona and yatchmaster( I think) that has the white. I had face teh same choice before but went with the classic EXP 2 16570... the size is just nice for me and my wifey can wear as a large watch save money$$$ hahah

    Leave a comment:


  • puck
    replied
    I'd go for the 16570 anyday. A true classic.
    Contrary to what some of us may say about the smaller size, it is all in the mind - take a look at it on the wrist from a distance. It is not that small. This is why it always looks good on someone else's wrist, but not our own.

    The large orange hands on the new versions just irritates me no end. The orange just obliterates the rest of the watch, and looks "comical". Even the THG sales assistants feel the same way.

    Reading throught this thread, i suspect that we are getting too used to wearing larger and larger watches. Bigger = "better". Before the large models like DSSD and the 116750 came out, we were all crazy and full of praise for the standard-sized sports models anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • evo8778
    replied
    prefer the old explorer 2 ....

    Leave a comment:


  • jasonsouza77
    replied
    I agree with watcher78. 42mm is cool. Now the 40mm cases look smaller to me. Hehehe

    Leave a comment:


  • watcher78
    replied
    i tink its a matter of time other sport series will move on to the 42mm direction. hence, get the new explorer.

    Leave a comment:


  • david_leehom
    replied
    see which size more suit for your wrist...

    Leave a comment:

Footer Ad Widget - Desktop

Collapse

Footer Ad Widget - Mobile

Collapse
Working...
X