I'm also eyeing the Explorer 1. Since you are considering the Z, D or F series, I suppose you are comparing between the 114270 (36mm) and 214270 (39mm) models. And not the 14270 (36mm).
Besides the size difference, the 214270 would probably be a newer watch pre-owned since it was only introduced in 2010. The 114270 was first released in 2010. The 14270 first came out in 1989.
The 214270 uses a newer movement Calibre 3132 compared with 3130 in the 114270. The newer 39mm also has the Paraflex shock adsorbers and Parachrom Bleu spring which is better in terms of anti-magnetization from what I read. I am not sure if the 114270 has that.
Exterior wise, you would notice that the 214270 has a sturdier Oyster bracelet compared with the 114270, a better Oysterlock clasp. The steel is thicker and the design is cleaner, not so fussy. The 3-6-9 markers on the 214270 no longer have lume and some people complained that the 'second' hand is too short in the 214270. The 'second' hand in the 114270 looks more right.
The above was gathered from what I read from some websites. Lol.
I suppose Ctgoh is right as to try it to see which suits you best in your wrist. 39mm is quite a big dial.
For me, I have a big wrist but I would still prefer the 114270. It is closer to the original Explorer which was made famous, 1016. The watch (6350) that Tenzing Norgay wore when he scaled to the summit of Everest in 1953. But that's me.
However, the watches be it 14720, 114270 or 214270 don't really look that much like the 6350 but more like the vintage 1016.
To each his own, I guess. Not sure if my two cents help. Lol.
Nav Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Nav Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rolex Explorer I vs Rolex Milgauss V
Collapse
X
-
go and try it in your hand then u will know which one suit u more. ;D
Leave a comment:
-
Am planning for Explorer 1 as my first Rolex but cant decide to go with 36mm or the newer 39mm... anyone with inputs?
Any considerations for the different Series (Z, D, F etc) for the 36mm one. I know its an indication of different production dates but any more consideration of one batch over another?
Please advice!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by wean_sg View PostI would go for brand new Exp I 39mm. Looks awfully good with that matt dial.
Leave a comment:
-
I would go for brand new Exp I 39mm. Looks awfully good with that matt dial.
Leave a comment:
-
nice sweet vintage milgauss. The thunderous second hand in new models makes a classy rollie look out of place
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Asskicker View PostMilgauss Vintage is the best :
That is one SWEET looking piece of vintage....very very nice!!!
Leave a comment:
-
I would prefer Milgauss than Explorer I, though I don't own either model. I feel the GV is more unique as I like the green glass (one of the three greens, submariner green bezel, GMT green GMT hand and green glass of GV Milgauss). This piece also highly sought after when it was launched, heard it gone up to S$20k when it was retailed $8k or $9k during launch. But fever subsided and now there is even slight discounts from retailers. I think current retailed price is more than $10k.
Both Milgauss and Explorer I are similar, just time function and no date, thus no cyclopes. But Milgauss is able to withstand strong magnetic fields. It's supposed to be for engineers who work in such places, but I think mostly people wear it for other occasions.
In any case, a Rolex is always a solid built with good resale values. Get the one you like most. And I believe you will have both pieces in your collection in future. It happened to alot of Rolex fans!
Leave a comment:
Footer Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Footer Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Leave a comment: