Nav Ad Widget - Mobile

Collapse

Nav Ad Widget - Desktop

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why Vintage?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • feilong108
    replied
    true..and s.crystal is much more costlier to replace...hahaha....plexi rules!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • exxondus
    replied
    Originally posted by zidaneong View Post
    vintage is nice, but i prefer s. crystal as i might damage the plastic crystal. Like my dad, have a small chip off from his 1500. sianz
    if its s. crytal, the impact that caused a small chip off his 1500 may shatter your s.crytal

    Leave a comment:


  • Destro22BT
    replied
    Originally posted by zidaneong View Post
    vintage is nice, but i prefer s. crystal as i might damage the plastic crystal. Like my dad, have a small chip off from his 1500. sianz
    Old style plexi glass is not difficult to find, just head down to ebronzeage or tophour and you can find it with ease. And especially when aftermarket crystals are made exact to the OEM specs, I don't find it a problem. When I send in a vintage rolex to RSC for verification, I have never once seen the technician inspect the plexiglass.

    Leave a comment:


  • zidaneong
    replied
    Originally posted by lthg25 View Post
    Well I am in my early 30s but i still like the look of vintage rolex. It has a very cool factor to it. The crystal looks a lot better than ones uses these days. Modern design looks very to date with new materials and new looks. But vintage has this nice feel to it. The vintage i have is even older than myself!
    vintage is nice, but i prefer s. crystal as i might damage the plastic crystal. Like my dad, have a small chip off from his 1500. sianz

    Leave a comment:


  • zidaneong
    replied
    Originally posted by feilong108 View Post
    i am one the old man...i prefer vintage...hehehe....becoz uncommon mah...lol...
    ok la, as long as you like it, can already.

    Leave a comment:


  • zidaneong
    replied
    Originally posted by exxondus View Post
    thats why they are considerd old man and we are young man.

    old man tend to like to huai jiu more cos they been thru a lot.

    young man have nothing to huai jiu yet so when become old man, a 2007 GMTIIc will be considered a piece of something for them to remember in their younger days.

    so all vintage collectors, OWN UP GRAMPs!!
    oic. i am still young.

    Leave a comment:


  • exxondus
    replied
    Originally posted by lthg25 View Post
    Well I am in my early 30s but i still like the look of vintage rolex. It has a very cool factor to it. The crystal looks a lot better than ones uses these days. Modern design looks very to date with new materials and new looks. But vintage has this nice feel to it. The vintage i have is even older than myself!
    u mean plexi right? a bit like plastic like that?

    Leave a comment:


  • lthg25
    replied
    But i am still "young"

    Well I am in my early 30s but i still like the look of vintage rolex. It has a very cool factor to it. The crystal looks a lot better than ones uses these days. Modern design looks very to date with new materials and new looks. But vintage has this nice feel to it. The vintage i have is even older than myself!

    Leave a comment:


  • feilong108
    replied
    i am one the old man...i prefer vintage...hehehe....becoz uncommon mah...lol...

    Leave a comment:


  • exxondus
    replied
    thats why they are considerd old man and we are young man.

    old man tend to like to huai jiu more cos they been thru a lot.

    young man have nothing to huai jiu yet so when become old man, a 2007 GMTIIc will be considered a piece of something for them to remember in their younger days.

    so all vintage collectors, OWN UP GRAMPs!!

    Leave a comment:


  • zidaneong
    replied
    Originally posted by lthg25 View Post
    I believe watch making tech has improved over the years and material used are more lasting and "better". I doubt vintage watches work or will last longer than current pieces. Plus for really old pieces, new parts may not be avaliable.

    This said I am not saying vintage watches are not lasting or poor quaility. I am sure they are solid to last all this time......btw I like vintage watches too....
    lol, that is what i heard from the others too regarding vintage watches and craftmanship then.

    Leave a comment:


  • lthg25
    replied
    Last longer?

    Originally posted by zidaneong View Post
    maybe vintage can work / last better than current watches?
    I believe watch making tech has improved over the years and material used are more lasting and "better". I doubt vintage watches work or will last longer than current pieces. Plus for really old pieces, new parts may not be avaliable.

    This said I am not saying vintage watches are not lasting or poor quaility. I am sure they are solid to last all this time......btw I like vintage watches too....

    Leave a comment:


  • teo
    replied
    Its like buying back mermories that we can not afford when we were young. Example: 1980s Transformer toys.

    Leave a comment:


  • zidaneong
    replied
    Originally posted by sportee View Post
    Maybe its the fact that vintage pieces are no longer in "production" whereas can just buy the recent ones...
    maybe vintage can work / last better than current watches?

    Leave a comment:


  • sportee
    replied
    Originally posted by lthg25 View Post
    Hi,

    Why do people like vintage rolex watches when the prices come close or are even higher than new pieces? Often these vintage pieces come less than perfect condition. So why vintage?

    Maybe its the fact that vintage pieces are no longer in "production" whereas can just buy the recent ones...

    Leave a comment:

Footer Ad Widget - Desktop

Collapse

Footer Ad Widget - Mobile

Collapse
Working...
X