Nav Ad Widget - Mobile

Collapse

Nav Ad Widget - Desktop

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

non watch photography

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Incredible pictures... nice!!!

    Comment


    • #17
      Thanks for your kind comments, I just wish I had the time to go out and take more. And also, I don't have skills with still objects like watches, need a light-tent, and good macro lens ... but don't have time to experiment.

      Anyone else good at portraits?

      Comment


      • #18
        i only have canon equipment. else can loan you. i tried to get around the light tent box by using 2 flash and placing a white cloth underneath. then light up the room with white light. however, have to be careful with the bounced flash.
        if you have issues with your account, click here for self help and read forum rules here. 90% of your answers can be found in Forum FAQ

        i DO NOT respond to any pm regarding account issues

        kindly email with
        1. subject heading indicating your issue
        2. your nick
        3. your corresponding email address
        4. state what you were trying to do and what the system prevented you to do


        if you receive no response in pm or email, it means your answers can be found in the Forum FAQ here

        your kind understanding is very much appreciated.

        disclaimer : all opinions expressed are personal

        Comment


        • #19
          Share a few more. Taken in 2005.





          Comment


          • #20
            Isn't that the tiger that killed....

            Comment


            • #21
              Very beautiful pics. The "murderer" is captured!
              The Crown Of Achievement

              Comment


              • #22
                very nice and sharp! thanks for sharing

                Originally posted by cmsoh View Post
                Share a few more. Taken in 2005.





                Comment


                • #23
                  the lion got a very interesting look



                  thanks for sharing, very sharp leh all the pictures...taken using SLR?
                  I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch.........

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    wahahahha... This is really the funniest caption for the week!

                    Originally posted by exxondus View Post
                    the lion got a very interesting look



                    thanks for sharing, very sharp leh all the pictures...taken using SLR?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by exxondus View Post
                      the lion got a very interesting look



                      thanks for sharing, very sharp leh all the pictures...taken using SLR?
                      Hahahaha very nicely done

                      you should use it as new avatar


                      Sometimes forgotten, but always contactable. Darkangel (2007-2014)

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by exxondus View Post
                        the lion got a very interesting look
                        thanks for sharing, very sharp leh all the pictures...taken using SLR?
                        Yeah, Nikon D70. Actually the lens more important than the camera body.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by cmsoh View Post
                          Yeah, Nikon D70. Actually the lens more important than the camera body.
                          i rem hearing that the lens is much much more expensive then the SLR is it true?

                          and for some lens, have queue list somemore, not like have money can buy that kind.
                          I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch.........

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by exxondus View Post
                            i rem hearing that the lens is much much more expensive then the SLR is it true?

                            and for some lens, have queue list somemore, not like have money can buy that kind.
                            Yeah, for those tiger/lion pics up there, the lens I used cost twice of the camera body.

                            But the dragonfly and butterfly lens was a classic cheap & good Sigma lens, only $300 bucks.

                            Its a matter of getting the right lens, not always the most expensive one.

                            Comment

                            Footer Ad Widget - Desktop

                            Collapse

                            Footer Ad Widget - Mobile

                            Collapse
                            Working...
                            X