Nav Ad Widget - Mobile

Collapse

Nav Ad Widget - Desktop

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pam 111 and 112 are nice but someome said they are just base model

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • nasty_42
    replied
    base model or not, it's still an excellent piece. neatly done.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shawncai
    replied
    Pam 112 All the way!

    Leave a comment:


  • dapoh86
    replied
    I wouldnt call them base models.. its like saying submariner is for people who don't have money to buy daytona.. until you see 1 that costs more than a regular Daytona..

    Leave a comment:


  • wjunkie
    replied
    Hahaha ... but think of it, the after "watch effect" not worth it.

    Leave a comment:


  • P1723
    replied
    hahaha hide watch from wife..
    u all very cute leh

    Leave a comment:


  • litost
    replied
    She will grumble coz i used to complain how i'm never getting a pam coz the models "all look the same"...
    And it happened...
    My other watches are a rollie and a tag, so yes she can tell...

    Leave a comment:


  • Fredtan
    replied
    actually doubt wife can tell the difference between the various luminors. to women they all look alike

    Leave a comment:


  • Spike123
    replied
    Wah...as if your pam is like second wife...cannot see daylight...

    Leave a comment:


  • Pumper
    replied
    Haha! Dude was in the same position. Hide the watches I bought in office cos scare wife grumble again.

    Leave a comment:


  • litost
    replied
    I just bought the 111 without my wife's knowledge...
    now wondering whether to ship my straps direct to my office...
    need to find a liang chen ji ri to tell her about my purchase...

    any bros out there with the same experience?

    Leave a comment:


  • beetlebum
    replied
    honestly i stay with the ETA PAMs... my 2 cents ;p

    how many 111/112/000/005 u see pple wearing? most now go for 312/359/320/351.
    the new handwound 8 days, i would give it a few more years

    the one i think still worth it would be the 233@ about 10~11k

    Leave a comment:


  • Rolexpam
    replied
    true

    Leave a comment:


  • clocking
    replied
    Originally posted by Ryuden View Post
    Thats quick...but...I would think that servicing the Eta movt is still way cheaper than the in house...even to a third party watchmaker/repairers...

    :-)
    Yes Sir!.. Eta movt is still way cheaper, nevertheless the in house can be done by third party watchmaker/repairers... May I say cheaper than Richemont..

    Leave a comment:


  • Ryuden
    replied


    Cheers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gunbucker
    replied
    I know. It's a tongue-in-cheek post to the ETA remarks.

    Originally posted by Ryuden View Post


    If this is the model you are referring...well...

    Firstly it's a vintage and with it comes history it accumulated more than 50 years...
    Like everyone says...history is priceless...unless you have $326,000 to spare...


    Leave a comment:

Footer Ad Widget - Desktop

Collapse

Footer Ad Widget - Mobile

Collapse
Working...
X