111 really the base, but i think is the best base you have with second hand and see though back...
Nav Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Nav Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pam 111 and 112 are nice but someome said they are just base model
Collapse
X
-
Less is More ! Simplicity is beauty ! Reliable and easy to Service ! Keep it simple !
I am keeping my pam 001 !The hardest thing in life is making the 1st million CASH !
The 2nd hardest thing in life is not spending it !
The 3rd hardest thing in life is get the whole family together for a simple dinner !
Comment
-
I have to agree with the guys here, the base modelas are the smartest. No doubt, it's not in-house movement, but it's less complicated & clean. I have owned 111, 112, 90 & 359 over the years & honestly, the first two gave me the most joy. It looks good under a work shirt & just as at home in jeans & boots. So why dont you give one of the base models a try & if you dont like it, sell it cheap cheap to me! Merry Xmas!I rather push my Alfa Romeo than drive a BMW
Alfa 1.5 Sprint
Alfa 33
Alfa 147
Alfa GT
Alfa Spider 3.2 V6- now
Alfa 4C- maybe next time
Comment
-
Why bother with such remarks? Most important is when you put on the watch and it puts a smile to your face whenever you are wearing it. If you put on a top of the line super limited edition model but you don like it, then its pointless isnt it?Originally posted by ladymatic View PostJust when some people and even myself are pretty fond of the simple design of 111 and 112, I remembered someone once gave me such a degoratory remark that such base models of Pam are nothing and worthless
Check out my Amateur Watch Blog @ http://parte-di-tempo.blogspot.sg/

tsetse the fly
hard to make more $$$ so can buy more timepieces 
Comment
-
Happy New Year, everyone. Have been away overseas...wow, thank you for all the sweet and kind comments
Another option is to go with the 42mm PAM 392. It looks great too, although I would prefer no second hand on the 9. But size wise, it should be ok on my small wrist. It's a new model and therefore is on the pricey side.
Comment
-
The main issue with 312 is its thickness not the case size. 392 houses the same movement but in a case 2mm smaller than the 312. Hence I imagine the thickness of 392 is even more obvious both look and feel wise so do take note.Originally posted by ladymatic View PostAnother option is to go with the 42mm PAM 392. It looks great too, although I would prefer no second hand on the 9. But size wise, it should be ok on my small wrist. It's a new model and therefore is on the pricey side.
On the other hand, some say 372 though 47mm doesn't wear very big and wear better than 312 due to it's thinner, so don't like base on case size.Watches are like potato chips - You never stop at one
Never political, seldom diplomatic, always honest
Comment
Footer Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Footer Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse


Comment