Boy size rolex

[leslie]

anyone still wearing boy sized rolex? remembered that boy sized datejust used to be very hot last time.. wearing men size datejust looks abit uncle? now that i started wearing sports size watches..wearing boy sized looks small..

[seiko.citizen]

like that one lah... i also wearing boy size, and suit me ok, now wear full size, boy size look like for my little brother

of course, it takes time and i think all is good, but boy size much harder to sell.

[leslie]

if I wear 38mm and above for 6 months..then the boy size looks weird initially when I put it on..it will look normal again after 1 week..but nowadays boy size very hard to sell..

[seiko.citizen]

if I wear 38mm and above for 6 months..then the boy size looks weird initially when I put it on..it will look normal again after 1 week..but nowadays boy size very hard to sell..

actually, i see more boy size on ladies wrist ... looks cute to be honest, however if the girl dont have big wrist she may end up knocking the watch way too often causing the crystal to break prematurely.

i to be honest dont mind boy size watches due to the fact that the surface area is smaller, and you are less likely to smash the watch into something/someone.

[leslie]

correct lor..I also noticed that my hands are more lively if I were to wear a smaller watch..less likely to wack into something..

nowadays alot of gals are wearing mid sized rolex..even seen one gal wearing the 14060m but the clasp is totally out of position..her wrist is simply too small..

[Darkangel]

It's ok for ladies to wear big watches but not that ok for guys to wear watches too small...but I think midsize is still ok.

[leslie]

midsize only 31-32mm..not too small meh?

[seiko.citizen]

It's ok for ladies to wear big watches but not that ok for guys to wear watches too small...but I think midsize is still ok.

correct, one of my uni friends sporting a 40mm expII and it looks quite good on a ladies wrist, but i should mention that she is a bit bulky

midsize only 31-32mm..not too small meh?

but the full size is 36mm... only 4-5mm out but look at the difference it makes.

[leslie]

correct, one of my uni friends sporting a 40mm expII and it looks quite good on a ladies wrist, but i should mention that she is a bit bulky



but the full size is 36mm... only 4-5mm out but look at the difference it makes.

34mm date also considered men size mah..but 34mm sounds pretty small to me nowadays..

[seiko.citizen]

i suspect the mid size was built for the smaller sized asians. i say this based on two reasons

a) higher sales in asia
b) known fact that angmohs are usually of bigger size

[triton]

i suspect the mid size was built for the smaller sized asians. i say this based on two reasons

a) higher sales in asia
b) known fact that angmohs are usually of bigger size

i beg to differ, maybe their marketing strategy is that the parents buy for their son to wear? hence boy size.

[seiko.citizen]

i beg to differ, maybe their marketing strategy is that the parents buy for their son to wear? hence boy size.

very possible, and nicely said. but was the 6694 called boy size back in the day? im not too sure, can someone elaborate for me.

[leslie]

i beg to differ, maybe their marketing strategy is that the parents buy for their son to wear? hence boy size.

i would rather buy my son a gmt instead..

[Darkangel]

i suspect the mid size was built for the smaller sized asians. i say this based on two reasons

a) higher sales in asia
b) known fact that angmohs are usually of bigger size

kinda agree with this

i beg to differ, maybe their marketing strategy is that the parents buy for their son to wear? hence boy size.

My daddy no buy me leh....hahha..possible. Maybe Men's size is daddy watch,mid size is son watch...ladies size is mummy watch...hahaha

[seiko.citizen]

kinda agree with this

My daddy no buy me leh....hahha..possible. Maybe Men's size is daddy watch,mid size is son watch...ladies size is mummy watch...hahaha

so where is the daughters watch? ... or is it share with mummy?