With date better for functionality! Without date better for aesthetic looks!
Both are winners!!!
Nav Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Nav Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Opinion : sub date or sub no date
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by nimm12Guess u have a tiny wrist
Do more weight training , might be able to solve your problem
I think my wrist is considered normal for Asian men. But you could be right. Anyway not everyone can pull off the look for the huge DSSD and that is a pretty well-known fact. I have seen people pull it off quite well but frankly most of them are a bit plump lol. If you are muscular and well- built enough to pull it off, then I guess DSSD could suit you. But seriously I have many friends who tried it and just find it too big. But That is not to say that it is a bad piece by any mean lol just huge lol.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by killerabcd View PostYes ever since the new Sub ND 114060 come out, everyone seems to like the ND better. I personally also feel the Sub ND is better. The cyclop kinda sucks. But the best is the old sea dweller. Damn it!! If only Rolex upgraded the old sea dweller to ceramic that will be the best lah. Clean ceramic look that comes with date but without the cyclop. Sian they come out with a stupid over size humongous DSSD.
Leave a comment:
-
The Sub no date looks cleaner in my opinion, however the one with date may worth a little more
Leave a comment:
-
Was deciding on date vs no date. In the end, got the date. Looks cleaner. Phone and computer will tell me the date. This is not my only watch, so it was easier. I guess if it is the watch I wear daily, the date would be my choice.
Leave a comment:
Footer Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Footer Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Leave a comment: