Nav Ad Widget - Mobile

Collapse

Nav Ad Widget - Desktop

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pam 111 and 112 are nice but someome said they are just base model

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • adamsdewan
    replied
    personally the base models are the nicest... clean look, uncluttered dial, can't beat that!!

    Leave a comment:


  • timefreak2000
    replied
    Less is More ! Simplicity is beauty ! Reliable and easy to Service ! Keep it simple !
    I am keeping my pam 001 !

    Leave a comment:


  • stektan
    replied
    I wear my base 111 much more than the Panarai own movement 351...it's simple, classic and stands out. And becos it is ETA, it reliable and easy to service next time without the need to go Richemont. How can that be a bad thing?

    Leave a comment:


  • Eltontan
    replied
    111 really the base, but i think is the best base you have with second hand and see though back...

    Leave a comment:


  • leeye
    replied
    whoever pays for the watch has the last say!

    Leave a comment:


  • Zhi_Peng
    replied
    Yes! It's a base model. So what? Its still a PAM afterall... I enjoyed my PAM 112 but had to sold it to flip for another upgrade.. Its a love or hate thingy. As long as we here love it can liao. I can't be bothered what negative comments pple give. Usually those around me give negative comments are those 吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alexlow
    replied
    there are many shallow, ignorant people who don't appreciate beauty. I think you got good taste, alot of time in design, less is actually more. Eye of the beholder, just enjoy what you think looks good and not what others think.

    Leave a comment:


  • chadwick
    replied
    Just follow yr heart

    Leave a comment:


  • Troy
    replied
    I own a base pam too and paid more than retail price (no choice)...but I am happy and enjoy wearing it. So base or not, AP or casio, as lg as u like it thats most important.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paneraii
    replied
    I don't agree with ladymatic friend friend. 111 and 112 is affordable but beautiful. Not everyone has money to buy 201a, Pre-As, ATs and the BTs.

    Leave a comment:


  • Xenon2
    replied
    Your money, wear on your wrists, your own preference, why bother about others.

    To each his/her own.......

    Leave a comment:


  • satch
    replied
    if u like it, why bother about what others say?

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymatic
    replied
    Simplicity is beauty. I like simple and clean dial. Easy to tell time and appreciate the uncluttered design

    Felt so insulted by a person who claimed to like PAMS and collect them. But a person like him only have eyes for those expensive vintage models *eyes roll*

    Anyway, I kind of like the latest PAM 392 model too

    Leave a comment:


  • Helmsley
    replied
    Originally posted by puck View Post
    For PAMS, the more complicated and cluttered the dial, the more rubbishy.
    The more limited the edition, the more suspect its value.
    The weirder the case material, the more suspect is the brand's focus.
    Clean dials work best whether limited or not.

    Still like the brand though, can't explain why. My $0.02

    This is all Stallone's doing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Watcha
    replied
    Panerai is all about look.

    Base=clean dial. Hour n minute hands only.

    So 111 not base.
    Its a beauty.

    Since its worthless, ask them go out to buy at 2k and you but from them 3k anytime.

    Leave a comment:

Footer Ad Widget - Desktop

Collapse

Footer Ad Widget - Mobile

Collapse
Working...
X